Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol I).djvu/110

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
70
HISTORY OF THE COLONIES.
[BOOK I.

contrary, but as near as conveniently may be to the laws of England, for the public good of the province; and to erect courts of judicature for the determination of all civil and criminal causes, with an appeal to the Palatine. But all the powers of government, so granted, were to be subordinate to the "power and regement," of the lords commissioners for foreign plantations for the time being. The Palatine also had authority to make ordinances for the government of the province, under certain restrictions; and a grant of full admiralty powers, subject to that of the Lord High Admiral of England. And the inhabitants, being subjects of the crown, were to enjoy all the rights and privileges of natural born subjects in England.[1]

§ 83. Under these ample provisions Gorges soon established a civil government in the province, and made ordinances. The government, such as it was, was solely confided to the executive, without any powers of legislation. The province languished in imbecility under his care; and began to acquire vigour only when he ceased to act as proprietary and lawgiver.[2] Massachusetts soon afterwards set up an exclusive right and jurisdiction over the territory, as within its chartered limits; and was able to enforce obedience and submission to its power.[3] It continued under the jurisdiction of Massachusetts until 1665, when the commissioners of the crown separated it for a short period; but the authority of Massachusetts was soon afterwards re-established.[4] The controversy between Massachu-
  1. Haz. Coll. 442 to 445.
  2. 1 Chalm. Annals, 474, 479; 1 Holmes's Annals, 254, 258, 296.
  3. 1 Chalm. Annals, 480, 481, 483; 1 Hutch. History, 176, 177. 256; 1 Holmes's Annals, 296; 2 Winthrop's Journ. 38, 42.
  4. 1 Chalm. Annals, 483, 484; 1 Holmes's Annals, 343, 348; 3 Hutch. Coll. 422.