nists. The introduction of it, therefore, was resisted by the people, as much as it could be; and indeed, in some respects, it was found impracticable.[1] Public dissatisfaction daily increased; and after a few years' experience of its ill arrangements, and its mischievous tendency, the proprietaries, upon the application of the people, (in 1693,) abrogated the constitution, and restored the ancient form of government. Thus perished the labours of Mr. Locke; and thus perished a system, under the administration of which, it has been remarked, the Carolinians had not known one day of real enjoyment, and that introduced evils and disorders, which ended only with the dissolution of the proprietary government.[2] Perhaps in the annals of the world there is not to be found a more wholesome lesson of the utter folly of all efforts to establish forms of governments upon mere theory; and of the dangers of legislation without consulting the habits, manners, feelings, and opinions of the people, upon which they are to operate.
§ 135. After James the Second came to the throne, the same general course was adopted of filing a quo warranto against the proprietaries, as had been successful in respect to other colonies. The proprietaries, with a view to elude the storm, prudently offered to surrender their charter, and thereby gained time.[3] Before any thing definitive took place, the revolution of 1688 occurred, which put an end to the hostile proceedings. In April, 1698, the proprietaries made another system of fundamental constitutions, which embraced many ofPage:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol I).djvu/163
CH. XIV.]
NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA.
123
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8a/Joseph_Story%2C_Commentaries_on_the_Constitution_of_the_United_States_%281st_ed%2C_1833%2C_vol_I%29.djvu/page163-1024px-Joseph_Story%2C_Commentaries_on_the_Constitution_of_the_United_States_%281st_ed%2C_1833%2C_vol_I%29.djvu.jpg)