Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol I).djvu/299

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
CH. II.]
OBJECTIONS TO THE CONSTITUTION.
259

CHAPTER II.

OBJECTIONS TO THE CONSTITUTION.

§ 281. Let it not, however, be supposed, that a constitution, which is now looked upon with such general favour and affection by the people, had no difficulties to encounter at its birth. The history of those times is lull of melancholy instruction on this subject, at once to admonish us of past dangers, and to awaken us to a lively sense of the necessity of future vigilance. The constitution was adopted unanimously by Georgia, New-Jersey, and Delaware. It was supported by large majorities in Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Maryland, and South-Carolina. It was carried in the other states by small majorities, and especially in Massachusetts, New-York, and Virginia by little more than a preponderating vote.[1] Indeed, it is believed, that in each of these states, at the first assembling of the conventions, there was a decided majority opposed to the constitution. The ability of the debates, the impending evils, and the absolute necessity of the case seem to have reconciled some persons to the adoption of it, whose opinions had been strenuously the other way.[2] "In our endeavours," said Washington, "to establish a new general government, the contest nationally considered, seems not to have been so much for glory, as for existence. It was for a long time doubtful, whether we were to survive, as an indepen-
  1. 2 Pitk. Hist 265, 268, 273, 279, 281; North Amer. Rev. Oct. 1827, p. 270 to 278.
  2. 2 Pitk. Hist. 266, 269, 281; 5 Marshall's Life of Washington, 132, 133, 188.