268
CONSTITUTION OF THE U. STATES.
[BOOK III.
to the extent proposed. It is obvious, that this objection, pushed to its full extent, went to the old question of the confederation; and was but are-argument of the point, whether there should exist a national government adequate to the protection and support of the Union. In its mitigated form it was a mere question, as to the extent of powders to be confided to the general government, and was to be classed accordingly. It was urged, however, with no inconsiderable force and emphasis; and its supporters predicted with confidence, that a government so organized would soon become corrupt and tyrannical, "and absorb the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of the several states, and produce from their ruins one consolidated government, which, from the nature of things, would be an iron-handed despotism."
[1] Uniform experience (it was said) had demonstrated,
[2] "that a very extensive territory cannot be governed on the principles of freedom otherwise, than by a confederacy of republics, possessing all the powers of internal government, but united in the management of their general and foreign concerns."
[3] Indeed, any scheme of a general government, however guarded, appeared to some minds (which possessed the public confidence) so entirely impracticable, by reason of the extensive territory of the United States, that they did not hesitate to declare their opinion, that it would be destructive of the civil liberty of the citizens.
[4] And
- ↑ Address of the Minority of Penn. Convention, 2 Amer. Museum, 542, 543. See also 2 Pitk. Hist. 272, 273.
- ↑ 2 Amer. Museum, 542.
- ↑ See also 2 Amer. Museum, 422, 423, 424.
- ↑ Yates and Lansing's Letter, 3 Amer. Museum, 156, 157; Mr. Jay's Letter, 1787, 3 Amer. Museum, 554, 562.—The same objection is repeatedly taken notice of in the Federalist, as one then beginning to be prevalent. The Federalist, No. 1, 2, 9, 13, 14, 23.
