tion. Upon its first introduction, it was supported by the votes of nine states against two. In subsequent stages of the discussion, it met with some opposition;[1] and in some of the state conventions it was strenuously resisted.[2] The wish of every patriot ought now to be, requiescat in pace.
§ 643. Another part of the clause regards the periods, at which the enumeration or census of the inhabitants of the United States shall be taken, in order to provide for new apportionments of representatives, according to the relative increase of the population of the states. Various propositions for this purpose were laid, at different times, before the convention.[3] It was proposed to have the census taken once in fifteen years, and in twenty years; but the vote finally prevailed in favour of ten.[4] The importance of this provision for a decennial census can scarcely be overvalued. It is the only effectual means, by which the relative power of the several states could be justly represented. If the system first established had been unalterable, very gross inequalities would soon have taken place among the states, from the very unequal increase of their population. The representation would soon have exhibited a system very analogous to that of the house of commons in Great-Britain, where old and decayed boroughs send representatives, not only wholly disproportionate to their importance; but in some cases, with scarcely a single inhabitant, they match the representatives of the most populous counties.[5]
- ↑ Journal of Convention, 11th June, 111, 112. See also id. 11th July, 168, 169, 170, 235, 236; 4 Elliot's Debates, (Yates's Minutes,) 69.
- ↑ 1 Elliot's Debates, 58, 59, 60, 204, 212, 213, 241.
- ↑ Journal of Convention, 163, 164, 167, 168, 169, 172, 174, 180.
- ↑ Journal of Convention, 12th July, 168, 170, 173, 180.
- ↑ 1 Black. Comm. 158, 173, 174; Rawle on Constit. ch. 4, p. 44.
