Page:Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1st ed, 1833, vol II).djvu/514

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
506
CONSTITUTION OF THE U. STATES.
[BOOK III.

cept that the words, "and with the Indian tribes," were afterwards added; and it passed without a division.[1]

§ 1056. In considering this clause of the constitution several important inquiries are presented. In the first place, what is the natural import of the terms; in the next place, how far the power is exclusive of that of the states; in the third place, to what purposes and for what objects the power may be constitutionally applied; and in the fourth place, what are the true nature and extent of the power to regulate commerce with the Indian tribes.

§ 1057. In the first place, then, what is the constitutional meaning of the words, "to regulate commerce;" for the constitution being (as has been aptly said) one of enumeration, and not of definition, it becomes necessary, in order to ascertain the extent of the power, to ascertain the meaning of the words.[2] The power is to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule, by which commerce is to be governed.[3] The subject to be regulated is commerce. Is that limited to traffic, to buying and selling, or the interchange of commodities? Or does it comprehend navigation and intercourse? If the former construction is adopted, then a general term applicable to many objects is restricted to one of its significations. If the latter, then a general term is retained in its general sense. To adopt the former, without some guiding grounds furnished by the context, or the nature of the power, would be improper. The words being general, the sense must be general also, and embrace all subjects comprehended under them, unless there be some obvious mischief, or repugnance to other
  1. Journal of Convention, 220, 257, 260, 356, 378.
  2. Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. R. 189.
  3. 9 Wheat. R. 196.