show that under parallel conditions the latent period also remains unaffected:—
TABLE V.—SHOWING THE EFFECT OF ELECTRIC CURRENT ON THE LATENT PERIOD.
| Specimens…………………… | I. | II. |
| sec. | sec. | |
| Latent period under normal condition………………………… | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| Latent period„ under„ current from right to left………………… | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Latent period„ under„ current from left to right………………… | 0.09 | 0.09 |
The results of experiments with two different specimens given above show that a current applied under the given conditions has practically no effect on the latent period, the slight variation being of the order of one-hundredth part of a second. This is quite negligible when the total period observed for transmission is, as in the following cases, equal to nearly 2 seconds.
Induced changes in the Velocity of Transmission.—Having found that the average value of the latent period in summer is 0.1 second, we next proceed to determine the influence of the direction of current on velocity.
Experiment 41.—As a rule, stimulus of induction shock was applied in this and in the following experiments on the petiole at a distance of 15 mm. from the responding pulvinus. The recording writer was tuned to 10 vibrations per second; the space between two succeeding dots, therefore, represents a time-interval of 0.1 second. The middle record, N in Fig. 46, is the normal. There are 17 spaces between the application of stimulus and the beginning of response. The total time is therefore 1.7 seconds, and by subtracting from it the latent period of 0.1 second we obtain the true time, 1.6 seconds. The normal velocity is found by dividing the distance 15
