way as the lungs shall not be affected, the cat will not die; now in those experiments that are made by forcing an animal to drink, there are two operations going on, one is a refusing the liquor, by the animal, its kicking and working with its throat, to refuse it, the other is a forcing the liquor upon the animal, and there are very few operations of that kind, but some of the liquor gets into the lungs. I have known it from experience.
Q. If you had been called upon to dissect a body, suspected to have died of poison, should you or not have thought it necessary to have pursued your search through the guts?
A. Certainly.
Q. Do you not apprehend that you would have been more likely to receive information from thence than any other part of the frame?
A. That is the track of the poison, and I should certainly have followed that track through.
Q. You have heard of the froth issuing from Sir Theodosius's mouth, a minute or two before he died, is that peculiar to a man dying of poison, or is it not very common in many other complaints?
A. I fancy it is a general effect, of people dying in what you may call health, in an apoplexy, or epilepsy, in all sudden deaths, where the person was a moment before that in perfect health.
Q. Have you ever had an opportunity of seeing such appearances upon such subjects?
A. Hundreds of times.
Q. Should you consider yourself bound, by such an appearance, to impute the death of the subject to poison?
A. No, certainly not; I should rather suspect an apoplexy, and I wish in this case, the head had been opened to remove all doubts.
Q. If the head had been opened, do you apprehend all doubts would have been removed?
A. It would have been still farther removed, because,
