Page:Medicine and the church; being a series of studies on the relationship between the practice of medicine and the church's ministry to the sick (IA medicinechurchbe00rhodiala).pdf/197

This page needs to be proofread.

knew no limitations, the craving for help, the faltering prayer, the shouts or sobs of joy, the tears of gratitude—daily he moved in the midst of it all.'

Are we then to conclude that our Lord attached no less importance to the cure of bodily ailment than to the spiritual redemption of men? Much has been written of late years which might seem to imply this. But the whole trend of Christ's teaching forbids us to emphasise the value of physical well-being at the expense of the master claims of the spirit: witness His words in the Sermon on the Mount about taking thought for the life or the body.[1] And therefore we must avoid mere rhetoric and special pleading.

(i) It is plain, at the outset, that our Lord set certain limits to the exercise of His healing activity. What has often been said of miracles in general[2] may be said of the miracles of healing. There is a severe economy in the exercise of such supernatural, or extranatural, powers. This is illustrated by our Lord's apparent reluctance to work miracles when it is not certain that a true faith asks for it.[3] In

  1. Matt. vi. 25.
  2. E.g. by Dr. Illingworth, Divine Immanence, p. 120.
  3. Cp. John iv. 48: 'Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe.'