Page:Medicine and the church; being a series of studies on the relationship between the practice of medicine and the church's ministry to the sick (IA medicinechurchbe00rhodiala).pdf/241

This page needs to be proofread.

Church, acting by her representative duly accredited and trained, her proper part in the work of restoration. The parish priest will freely allow that the doctor and the nurse, with all the appliances of modern medical science, provide the largest part of the environment and conditions indispensable to recovery; and that it is an act of presumption to reject all these scientific aids in favour of some process of healing by faith alone without expert medical aid.[1]

Finally, it must be remembered that we cannot expect to find many favourable notices of medical practice in an age and country in which medical skill was at a very low ebb. 'Medicorum optimus dignus est Gehenna,' said the Rabbis of the later Judaism.[2] In nothing has human knowledge made more astonishing strides than in medical and in surgical discovery; and, though we have been too prone in the past to credit the medical profession with the whole of the healing work done in Christ's Church, the opposite extreme is to be avoided, and it is well to acknowledge thankfully that 'discoveries in the region of

  1. In Acts xxviii. 9, 10, there is an implication of co-operation between St. Paul and St. Luke the physician; see Religion and Medicine, pp. 365, 366; the language is technical.
  2. See Dr. Swete on Mark v. 26; also Luke iv. 23; contrast Ecclus. xxxviii. sq.