instant way. In this work I am proud to have borne my little part.
But every gospel must be preached to all alike. It will be heard by the Scribes, by the Pharisees, by Demetrius the Silversmith, and the rest. Not lightly do men let their occupation go; small, then, would be our wonder, did we find the established prophet unconvinced. Yet, is it from misgiving that Mendel had the truth, or merely from indifference, that no naturalist of repute, save Professor Weldon, has risen against him?
In the world of knowledge we are accustomed to look for some strenuous effort to understand a new truth even in those who arc indisposed to believe. It was therefore with a regret approaching to indignation that I read Professor Weldon's criticism[1]. Were such a piece from the hand of a junior it might safely be neglected; but coming from Professor Weldon there was the danger—almost the certainty— that the small band of younger men who are thinking of research in this field would take it they had learnt the gist of Mendel, would imagine his teaching exposed by Professor Weldon, and look elsewhere for lines of work.
In evolutionary studies we have no Areopagus. With us it is not—as happily it is with Chemistry,
- ↑ Biometrika, I., 1902, Pt. 1.
