Page:Microscopicial researchers - Theodor Schwann - English Translation - 1947.pdf/223

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

THEORY OF THE CELLS. 197

already present in the cell (assimilation), or such as differ from it in chemical properties. The several layers grow by assimilation, but when a new layer is being formed, different material from that of the previously-formed layer is attracted: for the nucleolus, the nucleus and cell-membrane are composed of materials which differ in their chemical properties.

Such are the peculiarities of the plastic power of the cells, so far as they can as yet be drawn from observation. But the manifestations of this power presuppose another faculty of the cells. The cytoblastema, in which the cells are formed, contains the elements of the materials of which the cell is composed, but in other combinations: it is not a mere solution of cell-material, but it contains only certain organic substances in solution. The cells, therefore, not only attract materials from out of the cytoblastema, but they must have the faculty of producing chemical changes in its constituent particles. Besides which, all the parts of the cell itself may be chemically altered during the process of its vegetation. The unknown cause of all these phenomena, which we comprise under the term metabolic phenomena of the cells, we will denominate the metabolic power.

The next point which can be proved is, that this power is an attribute of the cells themselves, and that the cytoblastema is passive under it. We may mention vinous fermentation [1]

  1. I could not avoid bringing forward fermentation as an example, because it is the best known illustration of the operation of the cells, and the simplest representation of the process which is repeated in each cell of the living body. Those who do not as yet admit the theory of fermentation set forth by Cagniard-Latour, and myself, may take the development of any simple cells, especially of the spores, as an example; and we will in the text draw no conclusion from fermentation which cannot be proved from the development of other simple cells which grow independently, particularly the spores of the inferior plants. We have every conceivable proof that the fermentation-granules are fungi. Their form is that of fungi; in structure they, like them, consist of cells, many of which enclose other young cells. They grow, like fungi, by the shooting forth of new cells at their extremities; they propagate like them, partly by the separation of distinct cells, and partly by the generation of new cells within those already present, and the bursting of the parent-cells. Now, that these fungi are the cause of fermentation, follows, first, from the constancy of their occurrence during the process; secondly, from the cessation of fermentation under any influences by which they are known to be destroyed, especially boiling heat, arseniate of potass, &c.; and, thirdly, because the principle which excites the process of fermentation must be a substance which is again generated and increased by the