domestic, social, civil, political, and religious society. Such will a fair and impartial review of his literary efforts present to St. Leon the use and improvement of his talents and acquirements. That he intended such consequences, I by no means assert. I think it probable he did not. I should rather impute his work to an understanding so perverted by a favourite hypothesis, as to be unable, however acute and ingenious on other subjects, to distinguish truth whenever that hypothesis was concerned. We have no reason to suppose that St. Leon, who is in private life said not to be unamiable, would be guilty of such gratuitous wickedness, as to be intentionally a strenuous promoter of the most destructive profligacy. But whatever his intentions may have been, the tendency is the same.
Page:Modern Literature Volume 3 (1804).djvu/206
This page needs to be proofread.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8f/Modern_Literature_Volume_3_%281804%29.djvu/page206-1024px-Modern_Literature_Volume_3_%281804%29.djvu.jpg)