Page:NCGLE v Minister of Home Affairs.djvu/56

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

Ackermann J



    possible to be pro-family without rejecting less traditional family forms. It is not anti-family to support protection for non-traditional families. The traditional family is not the only family form and non-traditional family forms may equally advance true family values.”

    The same learned judge confirmed this view in Miron v Trudel above n 65 at para 100:

    “[L]egislatures have intervened in a wide variety of contexts to protect individuals’ vested interests in relationships of some permanence and interdependence. These interventions are not anti-marriage. They simply acknowledge that the family unit is evolving in response to changing times.”

56