DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE, 1,2-DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROMETHANE, CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE: METHOD 1018, Issue 1, dated 15 August 19 94, Page 4 of 4
chromatographic conditions listed on p.1018-1. The use of capillary gas chromatographic analysis was determined to be appropriate for all three compounds. Dichlorodifluoromethane: Method S111 was issued September 30, 1976 [2], and validated using test atmospheres generated in air and monitored with a calibrated total hydrocarbon analyzer [1,5]. Average recovery for 18 samples was 98.2%. In breakthrough tests at 12 and 94% relative humidity (RH), the capacity of the sampler was 61 and 44 mg of dichlorodifluoromethane, respectively, when sampling at ca. 0.045 L/min from atmospheres containing ca. 10,000 mg/m 3. Desorption efficiency averaged 0.97 in the range 7.4 to 30 mg per sample. Dichlorotetrafluoroethane: Method S108 was issued October 29, 1976 [2], and validated using test atmospheres generated in air and monitored with a calibrated total hydrocarbon analyzer [1,4]. The average recovery for 18 samples was 99.8%. Breakthrough (effluent concentration = 5% of test concentration) occurred after 158 min when sampling 14,600 mg/m 3 at 90% RH at 0.046 L/min. Desorption efficiency averaged 0.99 in the range 10.7 to 42.8 mg per sample. Chlorodifluoromethane: The precision and accuracy of the method were determined using test gas bag atmospheres generated and monitored with a halide meter. Average recovery for 18 samples over the range of 1780 to 6970 mg/ m 3 was 100 %. In breakthrough tests at 80% relative humidity, the sampler retained 15.4 mg of chlorodifluoromethane when sampling at 0.025 L/min from atmospheres containing 7000 mg/m 3. The desorption efficiency of chlorodifluoromethane from activated charcoal averaged 0.96 in the range 0.53 to 10.4 mg per sample.
REFERENCES: [1] Backup Data Reports S111 (Dichlorodifluoromethane) and S108 (Dichlorotetrafluoroethane), prepared under NIOSH Contract 210-76-0123, available as "Ten NIOSH Analytical Methods, Set 1," Order No. PB 271-712, from NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161. [2] NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, S111 and S108, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Publ. (NIOSH) 77-157-B (1977). [3] Seymour, M.J., M.F. Lucas. Evaluation of Sampling and Analytical Methods for the Determination of Chlorodifluoromethane in Air, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 54, 253-259 (1993). [4] NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin 46, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Publ. (NIOSH) 86-114 (1986). [5] NIOSH Research Report-Development and Validation of Methods for Sampling and Analysis of Workplace Toxic Substances, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Publ. (NIOSH) 80-133 (1980).
METHOD REVISED BY: M.J. Seymour, NIOSH/DPSE.
NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), Fourth Edition, 8/15/94
