?S?L?N? DmaC?ON? ?71 e?th? side ? ?mnt A?tt, ?d it w? ?mo,t e?dent ?t ?ey ? ? in a riv?. ? ?11s ? Mo?t Ups? ? II. ?M. %e v?hfion ob? off ?e ?t w? 6 � ? CAPE BOWLInG-GREEN is v? 1ov, nd projem for a ?nside?Me distauce ium ?e ?a: i? no?-east ex?emity h in ?e 19 � 10% ?d locirude 147 �? ? ?e mouu?inous ?ges ?e ? ? ?ir? mil? ? tho ?d, were it not for Moun? Upset aud Eliot, ?th of which m ve? viaibm, ud ?e aS m ?eD?t ?de, ?is pMt of �e ?t ?uM ? v?y d?gerous ? ?pro?h, p?t?ularly iu ? ?t, w?n ? m?k, ? ? M?n, w? great ? mqst ? ?d ? ?e bad. A ship p?ng ?h ?n ohould not come ?M ,? wa? ? &even ?o?; ?, in dir? a co.me f?om ?mt ? Mount U? sho? ? s?er? o?i?dy M ?e no?ward wesm? side of the mount. On appm?hing ?e cm?, if ?e ?ngs indicam a l?s depth ?u ? ?oms, ?e v? shouM ? haulS. more o? ?oe s? is ?u eider CAPE ?V?ND,. (htimdo 19 � 10', ?u?tude 14? 57' 5?,) like Mo?t U? ris? ?pfiy ?om a pmj?on of low laud. s?p?ng Clev?d Bay from a d?p ,iu?i? th? ?s uud? ?e b? of Mont a high ? wi? a round? h? ?d a ?, ? later ?i? at ?e south ex?e?y ? iu summiL Mount ?iot my pr?Jy ? s?n ? ? dis? ?.t?nty-five letups. if not f?er; ?tw?n it ? the hills of Ca? Clevel?d ?e h? is low, and is probably much h?t? by w?. A r?f ?nds from ?e ex?ty o? Ca? Clevel?d f?
�
