This page needs to be proofread.
?s suavzy o? ?z ?. we had ?rd?y concluded it ?1? ? we pr?, ?e probab? ?e ? less, ? we ?ve up ? ? w? we were wi? ? h? ? of m?y ? i? H?ver ?y: ?r ?g a s? of we ??, ?d pr? ? ? ?t ? b?; but ?r p? up ?. ?e m?e ? ?rm? by s? pr?- ?d ?y ?t ?gh; it app? ? ex?d ?ide?le ?, ?d ? ?e ?r pr? ? ?t of wa?r, B? ? two of
�
