Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/117

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
98
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

among the Unionists in Charleston. But after frequent conferences, Daniel E. Huger, James L. Petigru, James R. Pringle, Joseph Johnson, and others, as well as Poinsett, resolved at all hazards to organize an opposition to the schemes which to their minds promised ruinous consequences.[1] The work of organization was also materially promoted by Colonel William Drayton.[2] The Union party organization did not become effective, however, until their opponents had long been at work, and at no time did they feel confident of victory. Many, indeed, felt that the nullification disaffection had gained such a start that it would sweep over the state like an epidemic, a "terrible fever."[3] These were happily surprised at the results of the elections in October.

In Charleston the city election came the first week in September, and served as a preliminary test of strength; for although this question of state policy had no actual bearing upon the functions of city officers, it was made the issue of the campaign. There were to be chosen an intendant (mayor) and twelve wardens (aldermen).

  1. Poinsett Papers: Poinsett to Jackson, October 23, 1830.
  2. Poinsett Papers: Drayton to Poinsett, December 20, 1830, shows the extreme prejudices against which the Union party had to work.
  3. Mountaineer, September 3, 1830.