Page:Pamphlet of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, vol 23–24.pdf.djvu/62

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
50
PEACE PROPOSALS, 1916–1917

Empire decidedly (. . .)[1] to western civilization. The intentions of His Majesty the Emperor of Russia regarding Poland have been clearly indicated in the proclamation which he has just addressed to his armies. It goes without saying that if the Allies wish to liberate Europe from the brutal covetousness of Prussian militarism, it never has been their design, as has been alleged, to encompass the extermination of the German peoples and their political disappearance. That which they desire above all is to insure a peace upon the principles of liberty and justuice, upon the inviolable fidelity to international obligation with which the Government of the United States has never ceased to inspired.

"United in the pursuits of this supreme object the Allies are determined, individually and collectively, to act with all their power and to consent to all sacrifices to bring to a victorious close a conflict upon which they are convinced not only their own safety and prosperity depends but also the future of civilization itself."

Belgian Note supplementary to the Entente Reply to President Wilson's Peace Note, January 10, 1917[2]

''Ambassador Sharp to the Secretary of State

[Telegram]

American Embassy,
Paris, January 10, 1917.


Copy of Belgian note as follows:

"The Government of the King, which has associated itself with the answer handed by the President of the French Council to the American Ambassador on behalf of all, is particularly desirous of paying tribute to the sentiment of humanity which prompted the President of the United States to send his note to the belligerent powers and it highly esteems the friendship expressed for Belgium through his kindly intermediation. It desires as much as Mr. Woodrow Wilson to see the present war ended as early as possible.

"But the President seems to believe that the statesmen of the two opposing camps pursue the same objects of war. The example of Belgium unfortunately demonstrates that this is in no wise the fact.


  1. Apparent omission.
  2. Official print of the Department of State.