Page:Physical Geography of the Sea and its Meteorology.djvu/216

This page has been validated.
190
PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE SEA, AND ITS METEOROLOGY.

the water at the bottom of the great American lakes ought to remain there for over, for the bottom of Erie is far below the barrier which separates this lake from the Falls of Niagara, and so is the bottom of every one of the lakes below the shallows in the straits or rivers that connect them as a chain. We may presume that the water at the bottom of every extensive and quiet sheet of water, whether salt or fresh, is at the bottom by reason of specific gravity; but that it does not remain there for ever we have abundant proof. If so the Niagara River would be fed by Lake Erie only from that layer of water which is above the level of the top of the rock at the Falls. Consequently, wherever the breadth of that river is no greater than it is at the Falls, we should have a current as rapid as it is at the moment of passing the top of the rock to make the leap. To see that such is not the way of Nature, we have but to look at any common mill-pond when the water is running over the dam. The current in the pond that feeds the overflow is scarcely perceptible, for "still water runs deep." Moreover, we know it is not such a skimming current as the geologist would make, which runs from one lake to another; for wherever above the Niagara Falls the water is deep, there we are sure to find the current sluggish, in comparison with the rate it assumes as it approaches the Falls; and it is sluggish in deep places, rapid in shallow ones, because it is fed from below. The common "wastes" in our canals teach us this fact.

388 The bars at the mouths of the Mississippi an illustration.—The reasoning of this celebrated geologist appears to be founded upon the assumption that when water, in consequence of its specific gravity, once sinks below the bottom of a current where it is shallowest, there is no force of traction, so to speak, in fluids, nor any other power, which can draw this heavy water up again. If such were the case, we could not have deep water immediately inside of the bars which obstruct the passage of the great rivers into the sea: the bar at the mouth of the Mississippi, with only fifteen feet of water on it, is estimated to travel out to sea at rates varing from twenty to one hundred yards a year. In the place where that bar was when it was one thousand yards nearer to New Orleans than it now is, whether it were fifteen years ago or a century ago, with only fifteen or sixteen feet of water on it, we have now four or five times that depth. As new bars were