Page:PoincareDynamiqueJuillet.djvu/47

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

so that the total force can be divided into three components corresponding to the three brackets of expression (12); the first component has a vague analogy with the mechanical force due to the electric field, the other two with mechanical forces due to a magnetic field; to complete the analogy I can, under the first point, replace by in equations (11), so that X1, Y1, Z1 only depend linearly on the velocity ξ, η, ζ of the attracted body, since C has disappeared from the denominator of (11bis).

We pose then:

(13)

it follows that C had disappeared from the denominator of (11a):

(14)

and there will also:

(15)

Then λ, μ, ν or is a kind of electric field, while λ', μ', ν' or rather is a kind of magnetic field.

3° The postulate of relativity would require us to adopt solution (11) or solution (14) or any solution that would inferred by using the first remark; but the first question that arises is whether they are compatible with astronomical observations; the discrepancy with Newton's law is of the order ξ², that is to say, 10000 times smaller when it were of order ξ, that is to say, if the propagation happens with the speed of light, ceteris non mutatis; it is permissible to hope that it will not be too great. But only a thorough discussion will be able to teach it to us.

Paris, July 1905.
H. Poincaré