Page:Popular Science Monthly Volume 47.djvu/597

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
NEW CHAPTERS IN THE WARFARE OF SCIENCE.
581

amusements of the period among men of petty wit and no convictions was the devising of light ribaldry against him.[1]

In the midst of all this controversy stood three men, each of whom has connected his name with it permanently.

First of these was Samuel Wilberforce, at that time Bishop of Oxford. The gifted son of William Wilberforce, who had been honored throughout the world for his efforts in the suppression of the slave trade, he had been rapidly advanced in the English Church, and was at this time a prelate of wide influence. He was eloquent and diplomatic, witty and amiable, always sure to be with his fellow-churchmen and polite society against uncomfortable changes. Whether the struggle was against the slave power in the United States, or the squirearchy in Great Britain, or the evolution theory of Darwin, or the new views promulgated by the Essayists and Reviewers, he was always the suave spokesman of those who opposed every innovator and "besought him to depart out of their coasts." Mingling in curious proportions a truly religious feeling with care for his own advancement, his remarkable power in the pulpit gave him great strength to carry out his purposes, and his charming facility in being all things to all men, as well as his skill in evading the consequences of his many mistakes, gained him the sobriquet of "Soapy Sam." If such brethren of his in the episcopate as Thirlwall and Selwyn and Tait might claim to be in the apostolic succession, Wilberforce was no less surely in the succession from the most gifted and eminently respectable Sadducees who held high preferment under Pontius Pilate.

By a curious coincidence he had only a few years before preached the sermon when Colenso was consecrated in Westminster Abbey, and one passage in it may be cited as showing the preacher's gift of prophecy both hortatory and predictive. Wil-


  1. One of the nonsense verses in vogue at the time summed up the controversy as follows:
    "A bishop there was of Natal,
    Who had a Zulu for his pal;
    Said the Zulu, 'My dear,
    Don't you think Genesis queer?'
    Which converted my lord of Natal."

    But verses quite as good appeared on the other side, one of them being as follows:

    "Is this, then, the great Colenso,
    Who all the bishops offends so?
    Said Sam of the Soap,
    'Bring fagots and rope,
    For oh! he's got no friends, oh!'"

    For Matthew Arnold's attack on Colenso, see Macmillan's Magazine, January, 1863. For Maurice, see the references already given.