This page needs to be proofread.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
The most important separate treatises on the MSS. are Solbisky, De Codd. Propertii (Weimar, 1882); Housman, Journal of Philology, vols. xxi., xxii., Nos. 41–43; Postgate, Some MSS. of Propertius {Trans, Cambridge Philol. Soc. iv. 1); while O. L. Richmond, Towards a Recension of Propertius (Journal of Philology, vol. xxxi.), is also worth consulting. For a general discussion of questions connected with Propertius see Plessis, Études sur Properce (Paris, 1886), and more especially Schanz, Geschichte der Römischen Litteratur, Part 2, § 285 sqq. Teuffel's History of Latin Literature (English trans.) contains much of the same information, but is an older book and less thorough.
SIGLA
| N | = Codex Neapolitanus. |
| A | = Codex Vossianus. |
| F | Codex Laurentianus. |
| L | = Codex Holkhamicus. |
| μ | = Codex Parisinus or Memmianus. |
| υ | = Codex Urbinas. |
| ϛ | = Codices deteriores. |
xvi
