Page:Prophets of dissent essays on Maeterlinck, Strindberg, Nietzsche and Tolstoy (1918).djvu/26

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Prophets of Dissent

a characteristic unity. Very recently Professor A. J. Carnoy has definitely pointed out[1] the striking commixture of the realistic and imaginative elements in the work of the Flemish symbolists. "The vision of the Flemings" – quoting from his own précis of his paper—"is very concrete, very exact in all details and gives a durable, real, and almost corporeal presence to the creations of the imagination. All these traits are exhibited in the reveries of the Flemish mystics, ancient and modern. One finds them also no less plainly in the poetic work of Belgian writers of the last generation: Maeterlinck, Verhaeren, Rodenbach, Van Lerberghe, Le Roy, Elskamp, etc."

If we take into account this composite attitude of the Flemish mind we shall be less surprised at the remarkable evolution of a poet-philosopher whose creations seem at first blush to bear no resemblance to the outward complexion of his own age; who seems as far removed temperamentally from his locality and time as were his lineal spiritual ancestors: the Dutchman Ruysbroeck, the Scandinavian Swedenborg, the German Novalis, and the American Emerson – and who in the

  1. In a paper read by title before the Modern Language Association of America at Yale University, December 29, 1917.

[10]