Page:Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat.djvu/222

This page has been validated.
198
THOMSON ON CARNOT'S

we divide this by 618, we find 159 foot-pounds for the work produced by each unit of heat. This is 36.1 per cent of 440, the theoretical duty.[1]

(4) English engineers have contracted to make engines and boilers which will require only 3⅓ lbs. of the best coal per horse-power per hour. Hence in such engines each pound of coal ought to produce 565,700 foot-pounds of work, and if 7 lbs. of water be evaporated by each pound of coal, there would result 83,814 foot-pounds of work for each pound of water evaporated. If the pressure in the

  1. It being assumed that the temperatures of the boiler and condenser are the same as those of the Cornish engines. If, however, the pressure be lower, two atmospheres, for instance, the numbers would stand thus: The temperature in the boiler would be only 121. Consequently, for each pound of steam evaporated, only 614 units of heat would be required; and therefore the work performed for each unit of heat transmitted would be 160.3 foot-pounds, which is more than according to the estimate in the text. On the other hand, the range of temperatures, or the fall utilized, is only from 131 to 30, instead of from 140 to 30, and, consequently (Table II.), the theoretical duty for each unit of heat is only 371 foot-pounds. Hence, if the engine, to work according to the specification, requires a pressure of only 15 lbs. on the square inch (i.e., a total steam-pressure of two atmospheres), its performance is , or 43.2 per cent of its theoretical duty.