Page:Researches into the Early History of Mankind and the Development of Civilization.djvu/63

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE GESTURE-LANGUAGE.
53

The contrast between yes and no is variously made by different nations. The ancient Greeks used to nod (κατανεύω, ἐπινεύω) for yes, but to throw back the head (ἀνανεύω) for no; these signs may still be seen in Italy.[1] The Turk throws his head back with a cluck to express no, but can express yes by a movement like our shaking the head.[2] The Siamese priest's gestures in giving evidence, are raising his hat or fan to express yes, and lowering it to express no.[3]

Of signs used to avert the evil eye, some are connected with the ancient counter-charms, and others are of uncertain meaning, such as the very common one represented in old Greek and Roman amulets, the hand closed all but the fore-finger and little finger, which are held out straight. When King Ferdinand I. of Naples used to appear in public, he might be seen to put his hand from time to time into his pocket. Those who understood his ways knew that he was clenching his fist with the thumb stuck out between the first and second fingers, to avert the effect of a glance of the evil eye that some one in the street might have cast on him.

Enough has now been said to show that gesture-language is a natural mode of expression common to mankind in general. Moreover, this is true in a different sense to that in which we say that spoken language is common to mankind, including under the word language many hundreds of mutually unintelligible tongues, for the gesture-language is essentially one and the same in all times and all countries. It is true that the signs used in different places, and by different persons, are only partially the same; but it must be remembered that the same idea may be expressed in signs in very many ways, and that it is not necessary that all should choose the same. How the choice of gesture-signs is influenced by education and habit of life is well shown by a story told somewhere of a boy, himself deaf-and-dumb, who paid a visit to a Deaf-and-Dumb Asylum. When he was gone, the inmates expressed to the master their disgust at his ways. He talked an ugly language, they said; when he

  1. Liddell and Scott; Liebrecht in Heidelb. Jahrb., 1868, p. 325.
  2. Bastian, vol. i. p. 395.
  3. Low in Journ. Ind. Archip., vol. i. p. 356.