Open main menu

Page:Samuel Johnson (1911).djvu/31

This page needs to be proofread.


general intercourse of life, or found in the works of those whom we commonly style polite writers, be selected, without including the terms of particular professions ; since, with the arts to which they relate, they are gener- ally derived from other nations, and are very often the same in all the languages of this part of the world. This is, perhaps, the exact and pure idea of a grammatical dictionary ; but in lexicography, as in other arts, naked science is too delicate for the purposes of life. The value of a work must be estimated by its use ; it is not enough that a dictionary delights the critic, unless, at the same time it instructs the learner ; as it is to little purpose that an engine amuses the philosopher by the subtilty of its mechanism, if it requires so much know- ledge in its application as to be of no advan- tage to the common workman.

The title which I prefix to my work has long conveyed a very miscellaneous idea, and they that take a dictionary into their hands have been accustomed to expect from it a solution of almost every difficulty. If foreign words therefore were rejected, it could be little regarded, except by critics, or those who aspire to criticism ; and however it might enlighten those that write, would be all darkness to them that only read. The unlearned much

�� �