Page:Sanskrit Grammar by Whitney p1.djvu/157

This page has been validated.
Singular:
N. rathī́s nadī́s tanū́s
A. rathíam nadíam tanúam
I. rathíā nadíā tanúā
D. rathíe nadíe tanúe
Ab. G. rathías nadías tanúas
L. ..... ..... tanúi
V. ráthi (?) nádi tánu
Dual:
N. A. V. rathíā nadíā tanúā
I. D. Ab. [rathī́bhyām] nadī́bhyām [tanū́bhyām]
G. L. [rathíos] nadíos tanúos
Plural:
N. A. rathías nadías tanúas
I. [rathī́bhis] nadī́bhis tanū́bhis
D. Ab. [rathī́bhyas] nadī́bhyas tanū́bhyas
G. rathī́nām nadī́nām tanū́nām
L. [rathī́ṣu] nadī́ṣu tanū́ṣu

b. The cases — nadíam, tanúam, etc. — are written above according to their true phonetic form, almost invariably belonging to them in the Veda; in the written text, of course, the stem-final is made a semi-vowel, and the resulting syllable is circumflexed: thus, nadyàm, tanvàm, etc.; only, as usual, after two consonants the resolved forms iy and uv are written instead; and also where the combination yv would otherwise result: thus, cakríyā, [agrúvāi,] and mitrāyúvas. The RV. really reads staryàm etc. twice, and tanvàs etc. four times; and such contractions are more often made in the AV. The ending ā of the nom.-acc.-voc. du. is the equivalent of the later āu. The nom. sing. in s from ī-stems is found in the older language about sixty times, from over thirty stems.

357. Irregularities of form, properly so called, are very few in this division: camū́ as loc. sing. (instead of camvì) occurs a few times; and there is another doubtful case or two of the same kind; the final ū́ is regarded as pragṛhya or uncombinable (138); tanúi is lengthened to tanvī̀ in a passage or two; -yúvas is once or twice abbreviated to -yū́s.

358. The process of transfer to the other form of ī- and ū-declension (below, 362 ff.), which has nearly extinguished this category of words in the later language, has its beginnings in the Veda; but in RV. they are excessively scanty: namely, dūtiā́m, loc. sing., once, and çvaçruā́m, do., once, and dravitnuā́, instr. sing., with two or three other doubtful cases. In the Atharvan, we find the acc. sing. kuhū́m, tanū́m, vadhū́m; the instr. sing. palāliā́ and one or two others; the dat. sing. vadhvāí, çvaçruāí, agrúvāi; the abl.-gen. sing. punarbhúvās, pṛdākuā́s, çvaçruā́s; and the loc. sing. tanúām (with anomalous accent). Accusatives plural in īs and ūs are nowhere met with.