V. | भवन् bhávan |
भवत् bhávat |
अदन् ádan |
अदत् ádat |
जुह्वत् júhvat | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dual: | ||||||
N. A. V. | भवन्तौ bhávantāu |
भवन्ती bhávantī |
अदन्तौ adántāu |
अदती adatī́ |
जुह्वतौ júhvatāu |
जुह्वती júhvatī |
I. D. Ab. | भवद्भ्याम् bhávadbhyām |
अदद्भ्याम् adádbhyām |
जुह्वद्भ्याम् júhvadbhyām | |||
G. L. | भवतोस् bhávatos |
अदतोस् adatós |
जुह्वतोस् júhvatos | |||
Plural: | ||||||
N. V. | भवन्तस् bhávantas |
भवन्ति bhávanti |
अदन्तस् adántas |
अदन्ति adánti |
जुह्वतस् júhvatas |
जुह्वति júhvati |
A. | भवतस् bhávatas |
भवन्ति bhávanti |
अदतस् adatás |
अदन्ति adánti |
जुह्वतस् júhvatas |
जुह्वति júhvati |
I. | भवद्भिस् bhávadbhis |
अदद्भिस् adádbhis |
जुह्वद्भिस् júhvadbhis | |||
D. Ab. | भवद्भ्यस् bhávadbhyas |
अदद्भ्यस् adádbhyas |
जुह्वद्भ्यस् júhvadbhyas | |||
G. | भवताम् bhávatām |
अदताम् adatā́m |
जुह्वताम् júhvatām | |||
L. | भवत्सु bhávatsu |
अदत्सु adátsu |
जुह्वत्सु júhvatsu |
a. The future participle bhaviṣyánt may form in nom. etc. dual neuter either bhaviṣyántī or bhaviṣyatī́; tudánt, either tudántī or tudatī́; yā́nt (√yā), either yā́ntī or yātī́. And júhvat, in nom. etc. plural neuter, may make also júhvanti (beside júhvati, as given in the paradigm above).
b. But these strong forms (as well as bhávantī, du., and its like from present-stems in unaccented a) are quite contrary to general analogy, and of somewhat doubtful character. No example of them is quotable, either from the older or from the later language. The cases concerned, indeed, would be everywhere of rare occurrence.
448. The Vedic derivations from the model as above given are few. The dual ending āu is only one sixth as common as ā. Anomalous accent is seen in a case or two: acodáte, rathirāyátām, and vāghádbhis (if this is a participle). The only instance in V. of nom. etc. pl. neut. is sā́nti, with lengthened ā (compare the forms in ānti, below, 451 a, 454 c); one or two examples in anti are quotable from B.