higher grades of complexity, we are indulging in higher grades of abstraction from the realm of possibility.
We can now conceive the successive stages of a definite progress towards some assigned mode of abstraction from the realm of possibility, involving a progress (in thought) through successive grades of increasing complexity. I will call any such route of progress ‘an abstractive hierarchy.’ Any abstractive hierarchy, finite or infinite, is based upon some definite group of simple eternal objects. This group will be called the ‘base’ of the hierarchy. Thus the base of an abstractive hierarchy is a set of objects of zero complexity. The formal definition of an abstractive hierarchy is as follows:
An ‘abstractive hierarchy based upon g’ where g is a group of simple eternal objects, is a set of eternal objects which satisfy the following conditions,
(i) the members of g belong to it, and are the only simple eternal objects in the hierarchy,
(ii) the components of any complex eternal object in the hierarchy are also members of the hierarchy, and
(iii) any set of eternal objects belonging to the hierarchy, whether all of the same grade or whether differing among themselves as to grade, are jointly among the components or derivative components of at least one eternal object which also belongs to the hierarchy.
It is to be noticed that the components of an eternal object are necessarily of a lower grade of complexity than itself. Accordingly any member of such a hierarchy, which is of the first grade of complexity, can
