Page:Scientific Papers of Josiah Willard Gibbs.djvu/165

diagrams than they could be in words. It will be observed that a knowledge of the lines which divide the various different portions of the surface of dissipated energy and of the direction of the rectilinear elements of the developable surfaces, as projected upon the $X-Y$ plane, without a knowledge of the form of the $m-\zeta$ surface in space, is sufficient for the determination (in respect to the quantity and composition of the resulting masses) of the combinations and separations of the substances, and of the changes in their states of aggregation, which take place when the substances are exposed to the temperature and pressure to which the projected lines relate, except so far as such transformations are prevented by passive resistances to change.

Critical Phases.

It has been ascertained by experiment that the variations of two coexistent states of the same substance are in some cases limited in one direction by a terminal state at which the distinction of the coexistent states vanishes.^[1] This state has been called the critical state. Analogous properties may doubtless be exhibited by compounds of variable composition without change of temperature or pressure. For if, at any given temperature and pressure, two liquids are capable of forming a stable mixture in any ratio $m_{1}:m_{2}$ less than $a$, and in any greater than $b$, $a$ and $b$ being the values of that ratio for two coexistent phases, while either can form a stable mixture with a third liquid in all proportions, and any small quantities of the first and second can unite at once with a great quantity of the third to form a stable mixture, it may easily be seen that two coexistent mixtures of the three liquids may be varied in composition, the temperature and pressure remaining the same, from initial phases in each of which the quantity of the third liquid is nothing, to a terminal phase in which the distinction of the two phases vanishes.

In general, we may define a critical phase as one at which the distinction between coexistent phases vanishes. We may suppose the coexistent phases to be stable in respect to continuous changes, for although relations in some respects analogous might be imagined to hold true in regard to phases which are unstable in respect to continuous changes, the discussion of such cases would be devoid of interest. But if the coexistent phases and the critical phase are unstable only in respect to the possible formation of phases entirely different from the critical and adjacent phases, the liability to such changes will in no respect affect the relations between the critical and adjacent phases, and need not be considered in a theoretical discussion

1. See Dr. Andrews "On the continuity of the gaseous and liquid states of matter." Phil Trans., vol. 159, p. 575.