Again, if more than one kind of surface of discontinuity is possible between and , for any given values of the temperature and potentials, it will be impossible for that having the greater tension to displace the other, at the temperature and with the potentials considered. Hence, when has the value determined by equation (571), and consequently one value of the tension for the surface between and , it is impossible that the ordinary tension of the surface should be greater than this. If , when equation (571) is satisfied, we may presume that a thin film of the phase actually exists at the surface between and , and that a variation of the phases such as would make p greater than the second member of (571) cannot be brought about at that surface, as it would be prevented by the formation of a larger mass of the phase . But if wnen equation (571) is satisfied, this equation does not mark the limit of the stability of the surface between and , for the temperature or potentials must receive a finite change before the film of phase , or (as we shall see in the following paragraph) a lentiform mass of that phase, can be formed.
The work which must be expended in order to form on the surface between indefinitely large masses of phases and a lentiform mass of phase in equilibrium, may evidently be represented by the formula
(573) |
where denote the areas of the surfaces formed between and , and and ; and the diminution of the area of the surface between and ; the volume formed of the phase ; and the diminution of the volumes of the phases and . Let us now suppose remain constant and the external boundary of the surface between and to remain fixed, while increases and the surfaces of tension receive such alterations as are necessary for equilibrium. It is not necessary that this should be physically possible in the actual system; we may suppose the changes to take place, for the sake of argument, although involving changes in the fundamental equations of the masses and surfaces considered. Then, regarding simply as an abbreviation for the second member of the preceding equation, we have
(574) |
But the conditions of equilibrium require that
(575) |