Page:Shall we have a Channel tunnel?.djvu/29

23

The reply to this is contained in "Observations by His Royal Highness The Field-Marshal Commanding in Chief, dated, Horse Guards, War Office, 23rd June, 1882" (pp. 299-305), from which I will give you some extracts before the close of this Lecture.

Besides the above opinions, there is at p. 235 a "Paper purporting to give the views of Colonel Sir Andrew Clarke, C.B., K.C.M.G., C.I.E., on the Channel Tunnel," in favour of it, to which I shall again allude.

There is some further correspondence down to 29th August, 1882, to which I think it will not be necessary for my purpose to refer.

We have thus gone over the chronological history of the Channel Tunnel scheme, and we come now to consider some of the evidence and opinions on both sides of the question—-for and against it.

The evidence and opinions I shall bring before you are the following:—

Sir Edward Watkin,	$\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$	Evidence before Mr. Farrer's Committee, 13th December 1881, p. 194. Evidence before Sir A. Alison's Committee, 28th March, 1882, p. 260.
Sir John Hawkshaw,	$\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$	Evidence before Mr. Farrer's Committee, 16th December, 1881, p. 204. Evidence before Sir A. Alison's Committee, p. 266.
Sir John Adye,	$\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$	Memorandum, January, 1882, p. 218. Evidence before Mr. Farrer's Committee, 26th January, 1882, p. 227. Memorandum, May, 1882, p. 269.
Lord Richard Grosvenor,	$\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$	Evidence before Sir A. Alison's Committee, 30th March, 1882, p. 265.
Sir Andrew Clarke,	$\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$	Paper purporting to give his views, p.235
Sir A. Alison's Committee, "Channel Tunnel Defence Committee"	$\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$	Report of, 17th May, 1882,pp. 251-259.