Page:Starz Entertainment v. MGM Domestic Television Distribution.pdf/1

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
1236
39 FEDERAL REPORTER, 4th SERIES

fraud deprived him of an adequate opportunity to present his case. The district court did not err by denying Wofsy summary judgment on the fraud defense.

CONCLUSION

Wofsy was not entitled to summary judgment based on the public policy defense. No other ground for nonrecognition at issue in this appeal supplies an alternative basis for affirming the judgment below. We therefore REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

STARZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MGM DOMESTIC TELEVISION DISTRIBUTION, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 21-55379

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 10,
2022 San Francisco, California

Filed July 14, 2022