Page:Surrey Archaeological Collections Volume 1.djvu/249

This page has been validated.
MANOR OF HATCHAM.
149

that it must have been limited over to him after the bishop's death.[1]

Philip Burnel succeeded to his uncle's estates, but did not long survive him. He died 22 Edw. I., leaving by Maud his wife, daughter of Richard Earl of Arundel, Edward his son and heir, seven years of age.

By an inquisition taken on the death of Philip Burnel, in 22 Edw. I., it was found that he held at Hatchesham, in his demesne as of fee, one messuage, with a garden and fishpond, annual value 5s.; fifty-five acres of land, value 55s.; thirty-two acres of land, 10s. 8d.; twelve acres of meadow, 36s.; four acres of several pasture, value 4s.; two acres of marsh, value 2s.; rents of assize of free tenants, 7s. 4d.; a cock and a hen, value 2½d.; annual value of the whole manor, £6. 0s.d. It was held of the heirs of Adam de Bavent, by the service of 7s. 6d. a year, and owed suit to the court of Hatchesham Bavant, from three weeks to three weeks; it also owed suit to the hundred of Brixton, from three weeks to three weeks, with two tenants; clear value of the manor after all deductions £5. 12s. 8d.[2]

15th September 22 Edw. I. [1294], all the lands and tenements which belonged to Philip Burnel in Hachesham, and which were extended at 112s.d., per annum, were, with many other lands in other counties, assigned to Matilda, the widow of Philip Burnel, for her dower.[3] Edward Burnel, the heir, being under age at the time of his father's death, the custody of his person and lands was given to John de Drokenesford, Bishop of Bath and Wells.

Soon after this, the waters of the Thames broke

  1. Inq. post mortem, 21 Edw. I., n° 50.
  2. Inq. post mortem.
  3. Close Roll, 23 Edw. I., memb. 9, d.