Page:Sussex Archaeological Collections, volume 6.djvu/109

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SOME SUSSEX FAMILIES.
81

Weston of Albury and his descendants, whilst at an early period, Adam de Weston bore sable a chevron or between three leopards' heads as above (39). And in Vincent's ordinary of arms in the Heralds' College, a coat is ascribed to this name, which obviously belongs to this stock, and indicates a derivation from the Warren family, viz. chequy or and gules a bend ermine (40).

Ralph de Deane whose heiress married into the Sackville family, bore three leopards' faces for his arms, which were also borne by Sir Alured de Deane, who, according to Hasted, was of the same family, and of whose descendants there is a long pedigree in Berry's ' Kentish Genealogies.' This Ralph had an uncle of the same name, who was probably the same Ralph de Wiston whose father, also named Ralph, was the Doomsday owner of Wiston and other manors in west Sussex, whose arms, as above, essentially resembled those of the Deanes. Wantley, in Henfield, was one of these manors. In 1199, this was possessed by Philip de Wantley; one of his descendants, John Wantley, who died in 1424, lies buried in Amberley church. A brass memorial of him has engraven on it these arms, vert three leopards' faces, argent, langued gules. William Fitz-Ralph was the Doomsday tenant of the manor of Morley, in Shermanbury. "Fulco de Morle" was a witness to a charter of William de Braose, dated circa 1150. The Morleys of Glynde, who were descended from the Morleys of Morley, in Lancashire, temp. Edward III, bore Sa, three leopards faces or, jessant a fleur-de-lis arg. Now, arms as well as names have been corrupted, and an inspection of the coat of Wiston (No. 38) will show that the bearings there, might, by a careless transcription and rude drawing, be converted into the perplexing charges borne by the Morleys, and whose origin has puzzled the conjectures of heraldic students. Though the Lancashire Morleys are styled "de Morley," which generally indicates that the place gave name to the family, yet in this instance it was probably the reverse, the sign of the possessive case being omitted, which was a common practice. The arms of Morley, were also those of Cantalupe, who were of baronial eminence in the time of King John. Might not then Ralph de Wiston, the ancestor of the Deanes, the Morleys, and the Wantleys, be a cadet of Cantalupe (Comte le Loup), whose arms are veritable armes parlantes. If all these coats have

VI.
6