Page:Systems-of-Sanskrit-Grammar-SK Belvalkar.pdf/108

§ 77 -1. Systems of Sanskrit Grammar five stanzas at the end of the afa section of the com- mentary, a Tikä on the Mahabhashya called Chintamani, a new grammar for beginners called Prakriyamani, and a commentary on a stotra from the Padmapurana. 100 Jagannatha. This commentator also quotes and is therefore later than Dhanendra. We know nothing per- sonal about Jagannatha. The commentary bears the name of Sārapradipikā. Kasinātha. His commentary is called Sarasvatabhā. shya, but is not so diffuse as the name would imply. The author is not communicative about himself and the only thing that can be definitely asserted of him is that he must have lived prior to 1610 A. D., when a ms. (no. 292 of 1880-81) of his commentary was copied down at Barhanpur. Bhaṭṭa Gopāla. Is another commentator who can be similarly disposed of by noting that a ms. of his com- mentary was copied in A. D. 1615.. Sahajakirtl. It is a relief to come from these sha- dowy figures to one who is somewhat less chary of giving us information about himself. Sahajakiriti was a Jain, a Vachanacharaya and a pupil of Hemanandanagani of the Kharatara Gachchha. The com. is called Sarasvata- prakriyāvārtika and was composed¹ in A. D. 1623. Hansavijayagani-The contribution of this author is very slight, he having been apparently content to write a very diffuse com. called Sabdarthachandrikä on the in- troductory verses of the Sarasvataprakriya. He was the pupil of Vijayananda and flourished about Sainvat 1708 A. D. 1650. 1 Compare-Trasaka er et fa