the number of targets and to employ narrow columns (column of twos) that are not too deep. Supports must be far enough in rear (300-400 m.) to prevent two targets being struck by one and the same shrapnel.
Of the close order formations used in the Russo-Japanese war, platoons or sections in columns of squads or twos,[1] separated by a maximum interval of 50 paces, were indeed found more suitable under fire than line formations, but the losses were nevertheless very serious except where cover screened the advancing troops from view or afforded them actual protection.
During the Franco-German war, line of platoons in columns of twos was found advantageous on several occasions.[2] This formation has the following disadvantages, however: it is very susceptible to flanking fire; the influence of the officers is principally restricted to the leading elements; intervals are easily lost and on that account it becomes more difficult to form line. It would seem to be better, therefore, to advance in line of platoons (or sections) in columns of squads, or, under flanking fire, in line of squads in columns of twos or files. In the last-named formation the intervals between squads are easily lost, however, and the company then becomes a dense skirmish line of from four to six ranks. To echelon the platoons slightly has very little value on account of the depth of the beaten zone of modern shrapnel.
In attacks made during the latter part of the Russo-Japanese war, both belligerents finally made use of thin successive skirmish lines for advancing; these lines followed each other at 200-300 m. and united again on reaching cover.
- ↑ The advance against Beaumont and the height of Chancy during the battle of Beaumont. Hopffgarten-Heidler, Beaumont, pp. 124 and 238. Geschichte des Regiments, Nr. 93, II, p. 97. At Gravelotte this formation was employed with advantage by the Königin Regiment during its advance on Amanweller, and later in the campaign during the assault on Le Bourget. Geschichte des Regiments Königin, pp. 9 and 132.
- ↑ This formation is also well adapted for passing through woods. Taktik, VI, p. 108.
