Page:Tess of the D'Urbervilles (1891 Volume 2).pdf/294

This page has been validated.

TESS OF THE D’URBERVILLES

phet had told him, and he was not prophet enough to tell himself, that essentially this young wife of his was as deserving of the praise of King Lemuel as any other woman endowed with the same dislike of evil, her moral value having to be reckoned not by achievement but by tendency. Moreover, the figure near at hand suffers on such occasions, because it shows up its sorriness without shade; while vague figures afar off are honoured, in that their distance makes artistic virtues of their stains. In considering what Tess was not, he overlooked what she was, and forgot that the defective can be more than the entire.

end of vol. ii

Printed by R. & R. Clark, Edinburgh.