Page:The Bohemian Review, vol2, 1918.djvu/54

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
48
THE BOHEMIAN REVIEW

flows in their veins—men like Jeremiah L. Trnka of Hoboken, one of the original four-minute men, women like Miss Madeline Veverka, assistant superintendent of schools of Los Angeles. The Bohemian Review is proud of the fact that some of these little-known, quiet workers who have never seen the land whence their parents came, have been stirred up to do their little bit for old Bohemia through the columns of this paper.

THOUGHTLESS AND THOUGHTFUL EDITORIALS.

In tracing the comment of American newspapers on Bohemian events one is generally greatly encouraged by the growing appreciation of the noble stand of the Czechoslovak race and the righteousness of their demands. But occasionally a paragraph is found which arouses the ire of a Bohemian reader. Take, for instance, this short paragraph from the St. Paul Pioneer Press of February 6th:

“Bohemia now proposes self-determination, etc., etc. If Europe should really accept this formula, the continent would look like a patchwork quilt.” It would be unwise to lay too much stress on the would-be jocularity of the writer, but the fact that such writing is still possible proves that Bohemia, her place in history, her high degree of popular education, her long fight against the Hapsburgs, and the great sacrifices made by her men during the present war, are not yet familiar to the real leaders of American public opinion, namely those who write the editorial page of our newspapers.

But as against one disagreeable clipping like the one above there are many others on the style of the following dispatch published in the newspapers of February 25th: “A Daily News dispatch from Berne says: A neutral who has arrived here from Austria states that he was greatly impressed by the wonderful courage with which the Czechs are confronting their rulers. Hundreds of instances of Bohemian soldiers having deliberately thrown down their rifles rather than fight the Italians were mentioned. These men often made their choice well knowing that the penalty would be—as it invariably was—that they would be shot then and there.”

The Chicago Journal, always friendly to the cause of Bohemia, has written a splendid editorial on this text. After quoting the above cablegram, it says:

“In some ways, this is the finest chapter of war history that even Bohemia has written. She refused to fight the Russians at the very beginning of the war, but the Russians were fellow Slavs; and besides, the Bohemians then were together, and in part, at least, under their own officers. Thus the Twenty-eighth regiment, from Prague, went over to the Russian side en masse. But in the case just reported, the Bohemians were sent against a race with whom they have no ties of blood or language, and the organization which enabled them to act together in 1914 has been destroyed.

“There are no longer any Bohemian regiments. It is doubtful if there are any Bohemian battalions. Czech and Slovak soldiers are scattered in small groups among the troops of other races, so that they form a minority in the battalions of Poles, Ruthenes, Roumanians, Croats, Serbs, Germans, Magyars and other races under the Hapsburg crown. The officers are almost invariably Germans and Magyars, and these two races have charge of all the artillery and machine guns. Each little bands of Czechs or Slovaks is watched by superior numbers of supposedly unfriendly fellow subjects, commanded by unsympathetic despots, and liable to extermination at any moment by weapons against which it is helpless. Yet even under such circumstances, these heroes defy their tyrants, and die!

“The Spartans at Thermopylae did no more.

“This magnificent heroism imposes a duty on the Allies, the United States included, which we must never forget. No settlement of the struggle which leaves the heroic Bohemian people subject to the vengeance of the Hapsburgs and Hohenzollerns can be considered for a moment. It would be a betrayal, not only of the principles for which we are waging war, but of the liberties of the human race. Bohemia has earned her freedom. She must have it.”

FROM THE CZECHOSLOVAK ARMY IN RUSSIA.

Petrograd Weekly “Čechoslovák” contains a declaration of this army, dated September 28, 1917, the anniversary day of St. Václav, patron saint of Bohemia. It is an interesting historical document, which reads as follows:

“The Czechoslovak army, composed of volunteers born in Austria-Hungary, celebrates on this St. Vaclav day the third anniversary of the armed rebellion of the Czechoslovak nation against Austria-Hungary and the Hapsburgs, and sends warm greetings to all Czechoslovaks at home.

“The Czechoslovak army hails with feelings of pride and happiness the manly fight of the deputies in the home lands for full independence of our nation. The declaration of Bohemian and Slovak political parties, their political tactics and our determination to shed our blood to the last drop for the liberation of the nation prove sufficiently that the Czechs and Slovaks will never accept a compromise with the Hapsburgs and with Austria-Hungary. It brands as a lie the statement that Austro-Hungarian peoples desire to live in that monarchy which never had any regard for their life interests. The Czechoslovak nation founded Austria-Hungary; they have a right to make an end to it. Czechoslovak volunteers who proved at Zborov on June 18th that they can conquer swear that they will not only liberate their fatherland, but that they will punish the tyrants.

“We beseech you who are over there at home to go ahead without fear and hesitation, united with us in a common will and a common aim. Be assured that resolute fighting side by side with the free nations united against the Central Empires will win for us that freedom which we heave earned by our sacrifices and our labors.”