pose to see how the true freedom of the πόλεις was thus interfered with by the growing power of Athens.
A perfectly independent State must be able to take its own way without hindrance in at least four several departments of government; in finance, in judicial matters, in the form of its constitution, and in its foreign policy. If Ireland, for example, were wholly independent of Great Britain in these four points, she would constitute a separate State. Now, after 454 it may fairly be said that none of the members of the league were independent of Athens in all these particulars, and that some of them, at least, were subject to her in all. Let us take these points one by one.
1. The common fund had been transferred to Athens. A portion of the contributions was paid into the Athenian treasury; the assessment and administration were alike in Athenian hands. These contributions have therefore practically become a tribute paid to Athens. 2. In the case of some cities, at least, and perhaps of most, the most important lawsuits had to be taken to Athens for trial; and we know from an inscription that in criminal cases involving death, exile, or disfranchisement there was an appeal from one city (Chalcis) to the Athenian popular courts.[1] 3. Though Athens did not usually interfere with the constitution of the
- ↑ Hicks, op. cit. No. 28 fin. p. 35.
Abbott's History of Greece, vol. ii. pp. 370 foll., and Appendix iii.; Hicks, Greek Historical Inscriptions, pp. 29 foll.; G. Gilbert, Handbuch, i. 402.
