Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 1 Vol 7.djvu/298

29G SUJJKLEY. battle df Crwy, 1448, and in Hi? expedition to Gascon; in 1365. He d. i p, when the Barony fell into abey*nee4*) »**»*» IV. 13S0. .J Thomas lioTBi.Ktt, >■( Su.l.-liM, afs.!., ih'|v!hw nml Coheir nf t lie ftlMiVe. being ». and b. t>f WillijBM I.K Ki >i I i.h:u.(b) |, v Joan, one of the two »i8tere( c J nf John" Sink-ley. ahovenauicd, was, at the death of lui said uncle in 136/. ngrd 12 years, r«n I lie partition nf whose lands ill 13(18, lie obtained the manor of Sudeley. 4c. By the death of his mother's sister in 1380, lie became sole heir tn his internal trr aiidfather. and as such. according to the inddern ruling in such matter*, entitled,' 1 ! tn he LORD Sl'I>Kl.liY, but In- was never sum. to P«rt accordingly, thu* he survived such hcii ship for nearly '20 years ( u j He was kuiffhttd before (13S9-90, 13 Ric. II. when he bad lie t.i travel into I'rance. He «. before 18*8, Alicia, da. of Sir John BkuiHauI', nf Powyk. He (/. 20 Sep (1398] 22 Kjft II. His widow, who held Sudlev in dower, «. Sir John D.m.inuhiouk, who was living 1407. She d. (1412-43) 21 Hen. VI. V. 1398. f>. .Tons BoTBLER, who pr**il»ly(*) was entitled mi his father's death in 1388, to be LORD SriiKI.KY, 1st s and h. lie, who was aged 14 at his father's death in 1398, d. s.p. (long before his mother) in 1417- Barony by Patent. VI. 1417. G. Sm Ralph Doteler, who possilil,y( e ) was entitled, on his brother's death in 1417, to be Lord SUDKLKT, yst. hr. an.) h.( f ) He was knighted in, or before, 1417, and distinguished himself greatly in the wars with I'rance. &e. He. being then Chamberlain I. 1441, of the Household, was rr. by patent,(») 10 Sep. 1411, BARON t„ SODELEY, of en. Gloucester, with the usual lint, to heirs male of J473 his body. h ) with the fee of 200 marks nnnnaliy from the county of Lincoln. By the death nf his mother, 1442-43, he (ice.. to SudeW, and other family estates held by her in dower, being at, that date it) years and upwards. K G. about 1 1 1 i ; Treasurer of the Exchequer, 1 143 ; 1.. High (") The eoheirB were (1) Margery, his sister, aged at that date 30, and limn., hut won in., subsequently, Sir Robert Massey, and d. s.p. I3S0 : (2) Thomas Boteler, hia nephew, by .loan, his other sister, then aged 12, who eventually (13S0) became (as stated in the text) sole heir. ( b ) According to Courthope, he was a yr. s. of William [2.1] land Boteler Sc. who d. 1361. Nicolas remarks, with much truth (.«u& "Boteler"), that Dagdale'l " statement relative to the family of Boteler is very confused. ( ,: ) The seniority of the two sisters is doubtful: Joaue is called the eldest b]f Dngdale, but Tovvnsend {Coll. Top. et Gen , vol. v, p. 10) queries if she was not the youngest, ( d ) It seems, however, very doubtful whether a Barony which once has fallen into abeyance can de jure be assumed by one, who, subsequently, becomes heir to the entirety, without some act to shew the consent thereto of the Crown, in which, presumably, it vested during the period of its said abeyance. ( c ) " There bad been a regular discontinuance of writs from [1321] 14 lid. II. to [1307] 41 Ed- HI . when the last Lord Sudely died. The extinction of the dignity, however, is not to be inferred from this circumstance ; for in the case of the Barony of KitzWarin there had been a constant cessation of writs from [133. r >] 9 lid. 111. ui [144S-49] 27 Hen. VI.. and then Bourcbier, w ho had in. the heir general, was sum. by the title of Lord FitzWnrin. I therefore consider Thomas Boteler as heir of the Barony, tho 1 I do not find uira so sum." [l' Townaend, Windsor Herald. Sen " Coll. Top. et Gen:' vol. v, p. 9]. ( r ) Of his three brothers the two next abuve him, William and Thomas, had (/. s.p. (K) This was the second of the 16 Baronies cr. by patent before the reign of Hen. VIII. See b list of them vol. iii, p. 31, note "e," under Daubeny." I 1 ") " Here is the case of person, who, according t:> the present notion of descent of Baronies by writ, was the sole and undoubted heir of the ancient Barony of Sudeley, cr. by writ of summons as early as [1299] 28 lid. I., accepting of a peerage inferior in rank to that which belonged' to biui by right of inheritance and restricted ill the limitation of its descent to the heirs male of his body only." [F. Townseud, us in note "e," above.]