Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 2 Vol 2.djvu/430

414 BULKELEY BULKELEY See "Brassey of Bulkeley, co. Chester," Barony [Brassey], cr. 1886. BULLINGHEL BuLLiNGHEL, Baroiiy, see Goring, Viscountcy, cr. 2 Jan. 172 1/2, by the titular James III; and vol. i. Appendix F. BULMER(^) BARONY I. Sir Ralph de Bulmer,() s. and h. of John de BY WRIT. Bulmer, of Wilton in Cleveland and Bulmer, co. York, by Tiphaine,() 2nd da. and coh. of Hugh de Morwick, of I. 1344- Morwick, Northumberland. He sue. his father 17 Feb. 1298/9, () and his mother shortly before 28 Aug. 1315,0 when he was aged 30.(') Having done homage, he had livery of his in- heritance, 10 Dec. 13 1 5-0 He was sum. cum equis et armis from 14 Jan. (1299/1300) 28 Edw. I to 27 Mar. (1335) 9 Edw. Ill, to two Councils 15 Feb. (131 1/2) 5 Edw. II and 25 Feb. (1341/2) 16 Edw. Ill, and to Pari, from 20 Apr. (1344) 18 Edw. Ill to 20 Nov. (1348) 22 Edw. Ill, by writs directed Radulfo de Bulmer or Bulmere, whereby he is held to have become LORD BULMER, but none of his descendants were ever sum. to Pari, in respect of this Barony.(8) Sheriff of co. York 1330-32. He m., (1829) Venables-Vernon, 4th Lord Vernon. She accordingly took the name of Warner only, and on her death (17 Sep. 1837) her son, the 5th Lord Vernon, did the same. (") This article has been kindly contributed by G. W. Watson. V.G. (*>) His arms were, Gules, billetty, a lion rampant Or. i^) It would seem unlikely that this Tiphaine, who was aged 15 at the feast of St. Hilary (probably b. at Theophania or Tiphaine, i.e., Epiphany), 1 268/9, and '"• before 26 Apr. 1269 (Ch. Inq. p. m.. Hen. Ill, file 37, no. 13), would have had a grandson and h., /'. as late as 1340. It is however stated positively in the Inq. p. m. on Ralph de Bulmer and on his wife in 1357, that the husband was s. and h. of John de Bulmer, who must have been the John who m. Tiphaine. For some discussion on mediaeval English names see vol. iii, Appendix C. i^) John de Bulmer d. "xiii kal. Marcii " 1298/9, and was bur. in Guisborough Priory, according to W. de Hemingburgh [Chron., vol. ii, p. 184). The writ of diem cl. ext. was dated 4 Dec. 28 Edw. I [Fine Roily m. ij: Ch. Inq. p. m., Edw. I, file 93, no. 15). («) fine Roll, 9 Edw. II, mm. 20, 1 2. (*) Ch. Inq. p. m., Edw. II, file 46, no. 7. (s) As to how far these early writs of summons did in fact create any Peerage title, see Appendix A in the last volume. V.G.