Page:The Elizabethan stage (Volume 2).pdf/84

This page needs to be proofread.

by Nathaniel Giles, but only after an interval of either five or fifteen years. Ashmole reports Giles's monument as crediting him with forty-nine years' service as Master of St. George's before his death in 1634.[1] There must be an inaccuracy, either here or in the date of 1 October '37 Eliz.' (1595) upon a copy of his indenture of appointment by the Windsor chapter, which is amongst Ashmole's papers.[2] This recites that the chapter 'are now destitute of an experte and cunnynge man', and that Giles 'is well contented to come and serve' them. He is granted from the previous Michaelmas to the end of his life 'the Roome and place of a Clerk within the said ffree Chappell and to be one of the Players on the Organes there, and also the office of Instructor and Master of the ten Children or Choristers of the same ffree Chappell, And the office of tutor, creansor, or governor of the same tenn Children or Coristers'. He is to have an annuity of £81 6s. 8d. and 'tholde comons howse', wherein John Mundie lately dwelt, which he is to hold on the same terms as 'one Richarde ffarrante enjoyed the same' at a rent of £1 6s. 8d. His fee is to be 'over and besides all such giftes, rewardes or benevolences as from time to time during the naturall lief of him the said Nathanaell Gyles shall be given bestowed or ymployed to or upon the Choristers for singinge of Balattes, playes or for the like respects whatsoever'. He is to maintain the children and to supply vacancies, 'her Maiesties comission for the taking of Children which her highnes hath alredie graunted to the said Dean and Canons being allowed vnto him the said Nathanaell Gyles for that purpose'. Evidently the door was left open for a resumption of theatrical activities, such as was afterwards brought about at the London Chapel Royal during the Mastership of Giles there; but there is no proof that such a resumption ever took place at Windsor. It is perhaps a fanciful conjecture that the boys may have helped with The Merry Wives of Windsor about 1600.[3]


iv. CHILDREN OF THE KING'S REVELS

Masters:—Martin Slater and others.


[Bibliographical Note.—The chief source of information is J. Greenstreet, The Whitefriars Theatre in the Time of Shakspere (N. S. S. Trans. 1887-92, 269), which gives the text of the bill and answer in Androwes v. Slater (1609, Chancery).]


  • [Footnote: a play in which Altages is a character. The writer in the Musical Antiquary

thinks that a lament for Guichardo (not from either of the known Gismund texts) in the Ch. Ch. MS. is much in Farrant's style.]

  1. Ashmole, Antiquities of Berks (ed. 1723), iii. 172; cf. p. 41.
  2. Ashm. MS. 1125, f. 41^v.
  3. Cf. ch. xiii (Chamberlain's).