able personal character. Those who differed from him most in matters of opinion were readiest in expressing their admiration for the gentleness, simplicity and unselfishness of his disposition. His fame is secure, for, as Webster sajd in his noble eulogy, he devoted his great powers to justice, the greatest in terest of nijan on earth. "Whoever labors on tliis edifice: with usefulness and distinction, whoever clears its foundations, strengthens its pillars, adorns its entablatures, or contrib utes to raise its august dome still higher in the skies, connects himself in name and fame and character with that which is and must be as durable; as the frame of human society." An attempt has been made in the following selection f^om Justice Story's work to give 1 Some of his best known opinions may be found in the Venus, 8 (.'ranch 253; Craig?•. Leslie, 3 Wheaton 363; Houston 7. Moore, 5 it. I; Green?'. Middle, S it>. I; Ogden?•. Saunders, 12 it>. 213; Satterlee?• Mathewson, 2 Peters 380; Odlin v. Insurance Company, 2 Washington 312; Koss ','. The Active, it. 222; United States -'. Jones, 3 it. 209; Harrison T. Rowan, 3 Hi. 580; Golden -•, Prince, 3 it. 314; /ane?'. The President, 4 it. 453: Corfield?•. Coryell, 4 it. 38o;«General Kright's Case, Federal Cases. No. 14589; Crawford?•. The Wm. Perm, Peters' Circuit Court Report* 106, and The Seneca, 3 Wallace, lunior, 395In the United States Supreme Court: Vidal r. Ger ard's Executors, 2 Howard 127; Martin?•. Hunter's les see, I Wheaton 304; Swift p. Tyson, 16 Peters i: The Nereide, 9 Cranch 388; The Santissima Trinidad, 7 Wheaton 283; The Marianna Flora, 11 Wheaton i; Dartmouth College?•. Woodward, 4 it. 518: Charles Riv er Bridge r. Warren Bridge, 11 Peters 420; Prigg?•. Penn sylvania, 16 it. 539: Bank of United States?'. Dandridge, 12 Wheaton 64; Kriscoe -'. Bank of Kentucky, 11 Peters 257; Mayor of New York T. Miln, n it. 102; Groves r. Slaughter, 15 Peters 449; The License Cases, 5 Howard 504; The Passenger Cases, Tit. 283; United States v. Smith, 5 Wheaton 153: Conard T. Atlantic Insurance Co., 1 Peters 386: Inglis -•. Trustees, Sailors' Snug Harbor, 3 it. 99; Green p. Litler, 8 Cranch 229; United States T. The Amistad, 15 Peters 518; Carrington T. Merchants Insurance Co., 8 Peters 495; Waters?•. Merchants In surance Co., II it. 213; McLanahan?-. Universal Insur ance Co., i Peters 170: Van Ness r. Packard, 2 it. 137: Bradlie r. Maryland Insurance Co., 12* it. 378: The Vir gin, 8 it. 538; Columbian Insurance Co. -'. Ashby, 13 it. 331; Martin?•. Mott, 12 Wheaton 19; United States?'. Coombs, 12 Peters 72; Green?•. Biddle, 8 Wheaton i; Houston T. Moore, 5 it. i; Bank of United States?•. Bank of Georgia, 10 it. 333; Parsons?•. Bedford, 3 Peters 433. In the United States Circuit Court: Maritime law : De Lovio -•. Boit, 2 Gallison 470; l.e Jeune Eugenie, 2 Mason 409; The Julia, i Gallison 594; The Schooner Rapid, it. 295: The Brig Joseph, it. 545; The Ship Ann Green, it. 274: The Marianna Flora, 3 Mason 116: The Schooner Tilton, 5 it. 465; Harden r.
in the note below some idea of his vast con tributions to the law.1 Of Marshall's remaining associates, Thompson (1823-44) was most efficient. His work may be studied in Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Peters 591; Kendall v. United States, 12 ib. 524; Groves v. Slaughter, 15 ib. 449; Ogden v. Saunders, 12 W'heaton 213; Gen. Interest Insurance Co. v. Ruggles, ib. 408; Clayton v. Stone, 2 Paine 392. Duvall (1811-36) came to the bench at an advanced age, and his work was merely respectable. Trimble's short service (1826-28) offered little oppor tunity for distinction. McLean, Baldwin and Wayne will be considered in connection witn Chief Justice Taney. Gordon, 2 it. 541; Chamberlain T. Chandler, 3 it. 242; United States?•. Grush, 5 it. 290; The Schooner Vol unteer, i Sumner 551; The Ship Henry F.wbank, it. 400; The Ship Nathaniel Hooker, 3 it. 542; The Jeru salem, 2 Gallison 190; The Chusan, 2 Story 455; The Tilton, 5 Mason 465. Patent and Copyright law: Wyeth v. Stone, I Story 273; Brooks r. Bryan, 2 it. 525; Washburn r. Gould, 3 it. 122; Folsom?'. Marsh, 2 it. 100; Emerson -'. Davies, 3 /'/'. 768; Gray T. Russell, i ib. n; Barrett v. Hall, r Mason 447; Stearns -•. Barrett, it. 153; Earl v. Sawyer, 4 it. i; Ames?•. Howard, i Sumner 482. Equity: Harvey?•. Richards, I Mason 381; Hough r. Richardson, 3 Story 660; Klagg 71. Mann, 2 Sum ner 487; Doggett -•. Emerson, 3 Story 700; Jenkins r. Eldredge,;'/». 183: Weagie?•. Williams, it. 612: Wood -<. Dummer, 3 Mason 308; Dexter --. Arnold, 5 Mason 303i 3 Sumner 152; Tobey?'. County of Bristol, 3 Story 800; Bright?'. Boyd, I it. 478. Commercial and Mercantile law: Peele?•. Merchants Insurance Co., 3 Mason 27; Pape v. Nickerson, 3 Story 465; Peters 71. Warren Insurance Co., 3 Sumner 389; Bullard r. Hell, i Mason 143, Cremer T. Higginson, it. 323; The Ship Fortitude, 3 Sumner 228; Andrews?». Essex Insurance Co., 3 Mason 6; Clark?•. Protection Insurance Co., i Story 109; Jordan?<. Warren Insur ance Co., it. 342; Potter r. Ocean Insurance Co., 3 Sum ner 27; Humphreys?•. Union Insurance Co., 3 Mason 429; King p. Shepherd, 3 Story 349. Real Property : Gardner 7'. Gardner, 3 Mason 178; Parkman r. Bowdoin, i Sumner 359; Sisson?/. Seabury, it. 235; Uurant v. Ritchie, 4 Mason 45; Lippett v. Hopkins, I Gallison 454; Arnold v. Buffum, 2 Mason 208. Criminal and Miscellaneous: United States v. Moulton, 5 Mason 537; United States v. Grusht it. 290; United States -'. Battiste, 2 Sumner 240; United States ?•. Bainbridge, I Mason 71; United States?•. Wilder, 3 Sumner 308; United States -•. Bevans, Fed. Cas., No. 14589; United States v. Travers, it. No. 16537; Webb ?'. Portland Manufacturing Co., 3 Sumner, 189; Gilbert !•. United States, 2 it>. 19; Tyler r. Wilkinson, 4 Mason 397; In re Richardson, 2 Story, 571; Folsom v. Marsh, it. too; Reed p. Canrield, I Summer 195; Picquet v. Swan, 5 Mason 35.
