Page:The Green Bag (1889–1914), Volume 17.pdf/141

This page needs to be proofread.

128

THE GREEK BAG

appropriated, there may be a secondary meaning or construction which will belong to the person who has developed it. In this secondary meaning there may be a property right." The court refers particularly to the case of Scheuer v. Muller, 74 Fed. 225, 20 C. C. A. 161, and the excellent note found in the Circuit Court of Appeals Reports, and also cites Hygeia Dist. Co. v. Hygeia Co., 70 Conn. 516, 40 Atl. 534; Walter Baker & Co. v. Sanders, 80 Fed. 889, 26 C. C. A. 220; American Waltham Co. v. U. S. Watch Co., 173 Mass. 85, 53 N. E. 141, 43 L. R. A. 826, 73 Am. St. Rep. 263. "Consequently unfair competition is distinguished from trade-mark cases in this: that it does not involve necessarily the question of the exclusive right of another to use the name, symbol, or de vice. A word may not be capable of becoming an arbitrary trade-mark, and yet there may be an unfair use of the word which will constitute xinfair trade. The whole doctrine is based upon the

theory of protection to the public whose rights are infringed or jeopardized by confusion of goods produced by unfair methods of trade, as well as upon the right of the complainant to enjoy the good will of a trade built up through his efforts, and sought to be taken from him by unfair meth ods. Whether or not such facts are shown as to bring a particular case within these rules depends upon the testimony in each particular case in which the issue arises, and if it appear that such confusion has been or is likely to be produced, that there have been actual sales of one product for the other, that there have been actual mistakes of one for the other, or if there be such similarity of the two brands as that one may readily be mistaken for the other, a case is made out." Cit ing Fairbank Co. v. Luckel, King & Cake Soap Co., 102 Fed. 327, 42 C. C. A. 376; G. W. Cole Co. v. American Cement Co. (C. C. A.) 130 Fed. 703.

NEW BOOKS RECEIVED. A BRIEF SURVEY OP EQUITY JURISDICTION. By Prof. C. C. Langddl. A reprint of es says formerly published in the Harvard Law Review. The Harvard Law Review Asso ciation, Cambridge, Mass. 1905. THE DICTIONARY OP LEGAL QUOTATIONS, OR SELECTED DICTA OF ENGLISH CHANCELLORS AND JUDGES, FROM THE EARLIEST PERIOD TO THE PRESENT TIME. Extracted mainly from reported decisions and embracing many epigrams and quaint sayings, with explanatory notes, etc., by James William Norton-Kyshe, of Lincoln-'s Inn, London. Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd., 1904. Bound in cloth. Price in America, $3.00. OSGOODE HALL. Reminiscences of the Bench and Bar. By James Cleland Hamilton. The Carswell Company, Ltd., Toronto. 1904. HUMOR OF THE COURT ROOM. A lawful cornedy. By Philip Lindslcy. John F. Worley & Co., Dallas, Texas.

GAMBLING AND COGNATE VICES. By John R. Dos Passos. Pamphlet reprinted from Yale Law Journal, November. 1904. A DICTIONARY OF NEW MEDICAL TERMS. In cluding upwards of 38,000 words and many useful tables, being a supplement to "An Illustrated Dictionary of Medicine Biology, and Allied Sciences." By George M. Gould, A.M., M.D. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston's Son & Co. 1905. Half morocco, $5.00. STREET RAILWAY REPORTS. Annotated. Re porting the Electric Railway and Street Railway Decisions of the Federal and State Courts in the United States. Edited by Frank B. Gilbert of the Albany Bar. Vol. 2. Albany, N. Y. : Matthew Bender. 1904. Sheep, price $5.00. A GROUP OF GREAT LAWYERS OF COLUMBIA COUNTY, NEW YORK, VAN BUREN, TILDEX AND OTHERS. By Peyton F. Miller. Pri vately printed, 1904.