CANADIAN RAILWAY COMMISSIONERS have been the abolition of discriminatory rates,1 discontinuance of prohibitory rates and prescription of lower rates,2 numerous re-classification," disallowance of permission to make lower rates to manufacturers than to dealers,4 occasional authorization of ex1 Scobell v. Kingston & Pembroke Ry. Co., Case No. 21. Sydenham Glass Co., Case No. 42. 3 Cooperage Stock, Case No. 43. • Pea Millers' Association.^Case No 46. Metallic Shingles, Case No. 126. 4. C. T-IR. Co., Case.No. 124.
33
ceptional rates,5 authority to meet water competition, disallowance of excessive ter minal charges," an injunction to agree upon joint tariffs of through rates lower than the combination of locals, though it introduced competition into the local business of the company.7 MONTREAL, QUEBEC, December, 1907. 1 Party of students at reduced rates. 1 Wright & Sons, Case No. 320.
- Port Rico Lumber Co.
