of confusion. Baroness Riedescl says that on the evening
of the 9th of October, in Saratoga, when they had
marched but half an hour during the day, she asked
Major-general Phillips why they were not moving on
while it was yet time. The general admired her
resolution and wished she were in command of the army.
The same lady relates that Burgoyne spent half of
that critical night in drinking and making merry with
his mistress.
The army was given over to misery and disorder. On the 10th the baroness fed more than thirty officers from her private stores, “for we had a cook,” says she, “who, although a great scoundrel, was equal to every emergency, and would often cross little rivers in the night and steal mutton, chickens, or pigs from the country people, which he afterwards made us pay roundly for, as we subsequently learned.”[1] These supplies were at last exhausted, and the lady, in her indignation, called on the adjutant-general, who happened to come in her way, to report to Burgoyne the destitution of officers wounded in the service. The commander-in-chief took this in good part, came to her in person, thanked her for reminding him of his duty, and gave orders that provisions should be distributed. The baroness believed that Burgoyne never in his heart forgave her interference. It seems to me, from the writings of both, that spite lay rather in her bosom and her husband's than in that of Burgoyne. The memorandum which General Riedesel wrote and caused to be signed by his officers immediately after the surrender is a long impeachment of Burgoyne, and sets
- ↑ Baroness Riedesel, p. 178.
