This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

seems to me, has resulted from some of the writings of Dr. Dick, and from many similar works by other authors. Being possessed of a large amount of scientific knowledge, and of a bold, daring and active imagination; and impelled, no doubt, by a desire to enlighten mankind, the Doctor sets about solving that deep mystery, the philosophy of a future state. The implied basis of his argument is the popular doctrines in regard to man's future state, resting, as they do, entirely upon the sensual plane of the mind,—teaching that the material body will be literally raised—that the natural world will be burnt up, or, at least, renovated by fire, and other similar things. Having such doctrines for his premises, and pursuing his investigations by the light of the natural sciences, it is no wonder that before he finishes his book, he supposes he has discovered the location of the throne of God.

But the mind that has any perception of spiritual truth, shrinks back, and refuses to entertain such thoughts as these in regard to divine and spiritual things. It feels that such ideas are absurd and irrational, and even irreverent, though it may not be able to expose their absurdity in a logical manner. And the rejection which is thus given to the author's conclusions, is, unconsciously perhaps, reflected back upon the premises upon which his argument is based; and thus that system of doctrines called orthodox, is being gradually undermined, even by those who are laboring to uphold it; its power and influence over the mind is being weakened and destroyed.

I hope no one will look upon the above remarks in regard to the writings of a celebrated author, as being in any measure disrespectful. I have thought best to refer to his writings as a specimen of an extensive class. In his moral reasonings, there is much that is beautiful and true. But his speculations in regard to the laws of a future or spiritual state, as seen by the light of heavenly truth, are mere sensualism. They are derived, however, logically enough, from