able way of accounting for its present form and structure. Other facts in confirmation of this theory, are constantly accumulating, which are very clear and conclusive. It is asserted by eminent mathematicians, that "it has been ascertained, as a consequence of the theory of the moon's motion, that the interior parts of the earth are not only more dense than the exterior, but that the inner surfaces of the same density are symmetrical to the same centre and axis, as the external elliptical figure."
It will readily be seen that the fact here stated, could never have existed, unless the earth had been originally in a fluid state, in which each of its particles could move with perfect freedom, and assume a position and distance from the centre of the earth precisely suited to its specific gravity.
But while I freely admit and believe that the earth was once in a fluid and intensely heated state, I can find no good reasons for supposing that such is its present condition; but, on the contrary, I have found very satisfactory reasons for believing that, by the gradual reduction of its temperature, the earth became changed from a fluid to a solid state, many ages since. And it deserves to be incidentally noticed, that, "at the time of its consolidation, it had the same axis that it now has." This is evident from reasons previously stated, and which need not be repeated. This fact is worthy of especial notice, for it beautifully illustrates the permanent stability and uniform movements of the planetary system, and thus assures us that these earths were designed to be permanent seminaries for heaven. But the reader will very reasonably expect to be informed of my reasons for rejecting so favorite and popular a theory as that which supposes that the interior portions of the earth are still in a state of igneous fluidity. I am aware that this theory has been supported by many popular writers, who have regarded that immense storehouse of fire as a means held in reserve for the future destruction of the
